Case Law Update: Just Because HIPAA Does Not Provide a Private Right of Action, Doesn't Mean that Other Avenues Exist

Over the past decade, a shift has occurred where state and federal courts are holding that healthcare providers who breach HIPAA and other cybersecurity provisions may be pursued for a variety of common law claims including: negligence, emotional distress, breach of confidentiality, invasion of privacy, contract violations, and punitive damages.[4] The premise for bringing a cause of action for privacy violations stems from the fundamental source of American jurisprudence - the United States Constitution.

In re Columbia Valley Regional Medical Center, 41 S.W.3d 797, 802 (2001) established that, "there is a constitutional right of privacy in this case. Apart from any statutory or evidentiary privileges that apply, the medical records of an individual have been held to be within the zone of privacy protected by the United States Constitution."

• Byrne v. Avery Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology SC 18904 (Nov. 11, 2014) - A patient advised her doctor not to provide any information to her significant other because of a paternity suit. The significant other's attorney issued a subpoena and the health center, instead of alerting the patient or fighting the subpoena, simply handed over the records. The Connecticut Supreme Court held that HIPAA does not preempt against negligence claims and may be utilized in establishing the applicable standard of care.

• Acosta v. Byrum, 638 S.E.2d 246 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006) - A patient was treated by a physician who gave his access code to a third party, who in turn, viewed his records. The North Carolina Court of Appeals held that a privacy violation based on HIPAA violations was not a malpractice claim, so no expert certification was necessary; and HIPAA may be utilized in establishing the applicable standard of care.
   
• John Smith v. Arvind R. Datla, et al., Case No. A-1339-16T3 (Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division (Jul 12, 2017) - The judge kept alive a suit accusing a physician for disclosing a patient's HIV status without the patient's consent to an unauthorized third party.