Is it appropriate to report code 64640 in conjunction with code 76942 ? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This short coding guidance article is for coders, billers, auditors, and clinical documentation teams who need to understand how a peripheral nerve destruction service relates to ultrasound guidance reporting. It discusses the code pair in question, the general rationale for reporting both when imaging is not considered inherent to the procedure, and the type of coding question that arises when guidance is used during a procedure.
Why This Topic Matters
Correctly distinguishing a primary procedure from separately reportable imaging guidance affects coding accuracy, claim submission, and audit readiness when ultrasound is used during nerve-related interventions.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames reporting a peripheral nerve destruction service alongside ultrasound guidance
- What general issue is being addressed when imaging support is used during a procedure
- How the article characterizes the relationship between a procedure code and imaging supervision/interpretation in broad terms
- Why documentation and code-set awareness matter for this coding scenario
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Billing staff
- Practice managers
- Clinical documentation specialists
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com