How is code 75898 (REVISED IN 2013) reported in conjunction with transcatheter embolization? Is it reported for each follow-up angiogram performed, only once for each individual vessel embolized, or only once for the entire operative site embolized? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This short coding guidance article discusses reporting follow-up angiography in the context of transcatheter embolization and infusion therapy. It is aimed at coders, billers, and revenue cycle staff who need to understand the scope of the service, how reporting relates to operative fields and sessions, and when modifier use may be relevant alongside radiology supervision and interpretation coding. The article provides a focused clarification on a revised code and the general circumstances under which the follow-up study is addressed.
Why This Topic Matters
Correct reporting of follow-up angiography can affect claim accuracy when therapy is performed across one or more operative fields. The guidance also highlights modifier use in a radiology context, which matters for compliant billing and reduced claim edits.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames follow-up angiography in relation to transcatheter embolization and infusion therapy
- How reporting is discussed across operative fields and separate sessions
- How the article addresses modifier use in the context of diagnostic angiography and therapeutic radiological supervision and interpretation
- How the revised code is presented within a practical coding question-and-answer format
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Outpatient facility coders
- Radiology billing staff
- Revenue cycle specialists
- Coding auditors
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com