Regarding the omentectomy in CPT codes 58953 and 58956 , for code 58953 , Bilateral salpino-oophorectomy with omentectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and radical dissection for debulking, there is no mention of total/complete omentectomy in the code descriptor, yet the clinical example in the February 2002 newsletter describes complete or entire removal of the omentum. For code 58956 , Bilateral salpingo- oophorectomy with total omentectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy for malignancy, the code descriptor states total omentectomy, but the clinical example in the CPT Changes 2005 describes complete or entire removal of the omentum.Does code 58953 include partial or total omentectomy? If only for total omentectomy, should modifier 52 be applied when a partial omentectomy is performed? For code 58956 , if a complete/ total omentectomy is not performed, would modifier 52 be required to appropriately report the service? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This premium article addresses a coding clarification for gynecologic surgical procedures in CPT, focusing on how omentectomy is reflected in two hysterectomy-and-debulking related codes. It is intended for coding professionals seeking guidance on code interpretation, related clinical example references, and whether modifier 52 is needed when the extent of omentectomy differs from the code wording. The article compares source materials from CPT-related publications and explains the scope of the reporting issue at a high level.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate interpretation of surgical code terminology affects procedure reporting consistency and modifier use in gynecologic oncology cases. This topic is especially relevant for coders, auditors, and compliance staff who work with operative documentation and CPT updates.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames a coding question about omentectomy within two CPT surgery codes
- What source materials are referenced in connection with the codes
- Why modifier 52 is raised as part of the discussion
- How the article situates the issue within gynecologic surgical coding
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance staff
- Gynecologic surgery coding specialists
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com