decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2016 Issue 5 (May)
Don’t use scribes for CPOE if you want to meet meaningful use
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains a meaningful use compliance question involving scribes, transcriptionists, and other non-physician staff entering information into the electronic health record. It focuses on the general boundary around computerized provider order entry, the role of licensure or credentialing, and a possible pending-order workflow in some EHR systems. The piece is relevant to physician practices, hospital departments, compliance staff, and EHR workflow teams evaluating how documentation and order entry responsibilities are assigned.
Why This Topic Matters
Organizations using scribes or transcription support need to understand how EHR workflows intersect with meaningful use requirements and staff qualifications. The article helps readers assess whether their documentation process may create compliance risk or workflow problems.
What You Will Learn
- How meaningful use relates to documentation performed by scribes and transcriptionists
- Why computerized provider order entry is treated differently from ordinary note-taking
- What general EHR workflow feature may affect how order-related prompts appear
- How broader reporting changes may affect the relevance of this issue
Who Should Read This
- Physicians and medical groups
- Hospital and emergency department administrators
- Compliance and reimbursement staff
- EHR superusers and informatics teams
- Scribes, transcriptionists, and practice managers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com