Note: The following article synopsis was NOT provided by HCPro. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.
Article Overview
This article is a brief news-style overview for practices and billing/coding stakeholders tracking MIPS participation during the 2017 transition year. It summarizes survey responses about intended reporting approaches, uncertainty around participation, and the effect of those choices on future incentive payments and penalties. The focus is on general MIPS participation trends and CMS benchmark context, not on detailed coding instructions.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers gauge how other practices were approaching MIPS in a transition year and why participation levels could affect future payment outcomes.
What You Will Learn
How a medical practice survey characterized planned MIPS participation during the 2017 transition year.
Why practices were weighing whether to report minimally, broadly, or not at all.
How uncertainty in participation could influence incentive payment competition and penalty exposure.
The general role of CMS-set thresholds in the transition year.
Who Should Read This
Physician practices
Practice managers
Medical coders
Billing professionals
Healthcare compliance staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Official DecisionHealth® Newsletter Archives includes:
Includes over 25,000 articles from:
Coder Pink Sheets
Part B News
Answer Books newsletters
Current newsletters added each quarter
Timely news and guidance vital for your practice
Fully searchable through Find-A-Code's Comprehensive Search
Codes mentioned in articles are linked to the Find-A-Code Code Information pages
Code Information pages link back to related articles
Save yourself tons of research time, find everything in one place!
Access to this feature is available in the following products:
DecisionHealth Coding, Billing and Compliance Library
Related Articles
Articles are listed in order of calculated relevance.