DecisionHealth, DecisionHealth - 2022 Issue 4 (April)
Unreliable ‘source’? Try others, and document the disagreement
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains a CPT evaluation and management documentation issue for encounters involving a cognitively impaired patient and another person providing history. It focuses on when outside historical information may support E/M data review and complexity, what to do when the provided account seems unreliable, and why documentation and practice compliance processes matter. The piece is aimed at coders, billers, and clinicians working with office or outpatient E/M services and prolonged services guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate use of history sources can affect E/M documentation support and compliance when the patient cannot provide a dependable account. The article helps readers recognize the broader CPT framework for relying on another person’s information while also highlighting the need to document concerns and follow internal procedures when the history may be inaccurate.
What You Will Learn
- How CPT frames the use of an independent historian in E/M documentation
- The difference between an independent historian and an appropriate source
- What to consider when the history provided appears unreliable
- Why documenting disagreement or concern may be important
- How compliance protocols may guide next steps when suspicious information is encountered
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Medical billers
- Physicians and other clinicians
- Compliance staff
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com