tci ED Coding & Reimbursement Alert - 2009 Issue 4

Affect ED's Bottom Line With Nosebleed Repair Smarts

ED coders often under-report their ED's epistaxis claims. If you can't differentiate a complex anterior nosebleed repair from a simple one, you-re costing your ED nearly $20 per misidentified claim. Further, coders who cannot discern a reportable nosebleed repair encounter from an E/M will subject the practice to upcoding concerns. Check out these basics for each type of nosebleed repair to nail your coding each time. Consider E/M for Non-Active Nosebleeds If a patient reports to the ED with a nosebleed, and the physician stops the bleeding with basic methods, the coder usually chooses an E/M code,confirms Linda...

To read the full article, sign in and subscribe to tci ED Coding & Reimbursement Alert.


You have ED coding questions, and we deliver money-in-the-bank answers to help you defeat your claim issues and secure optimal reimbursement.

Stay in the know and avoid federal reproach with your subscription to TCI’s ED Coding and Reimbursement Alert.

  • Current newsletters added each month
  • Fully searchable archives - over 2100 articles
  • ALL years/issues back to 1998 organized by year and issue
  • Codes mentioned in articles are linked to Code Information pages
  • Code Information pages link back to related articles
Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • tci ED Coding & Reimbursement Alert +Archives

demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.