Most payers feel system must be mandatory to work.MedPAC, private insurers, CMS, many health-policy analysts, and even members of Congress are endorsing pay-for-performance (P4P). In general, people who pay for health care see pay-for-performance as a way of directing $2 trillion in annual U.S. spending toward care that has high value and is delivered efficiently. Would P4P be mandatory? Of course, say payers. Otherwise, those who can't or won't meet standards simply wouldn't play, and determining whether their care delivers adequate value for the dollar would be impossible.Yet to be convinced, however, are many providers. For...
To read the full article, sign in and subscribe to tci Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement.
Keep pace with evolving Medicare regulations — and onboard your team — with timely analysis of critical updates interpreted in an easy-to-follow, easy-to-apply format. Your subscription to TCI's Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement Alert will equip you to navigate code and guideline changes, CCI edits, and revisions to modifiers, payer policies, the fee schedule, OIG target areas, and more.
Current newsletters added each month
Fully searchable archives - over 4200 articles
ALL years/issues back to 2003 organized by year and issue
Codes mentioned in articles are linked to Code Information pages
Code Information pages link back to related articles
Access to this feature is available in the following products: