Regarding the omentectomy in CPT codes 58953 and 58956 , for code 58953 , Bilateral salpino-oophorectomy with omentectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and radical dissection for debulking, there is no mention of total/complete omentectomy in the code descriptor, yet the clinical example in the February 2002 newsletter describes complete or entire removal of the omentum. For code 58956 , Bilateral salpingo- oophorectomy with total omentectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy for malignancy, the code descriptor states total omentectomy, but the clinical example in the CPT Changes 2005 describes complete or entire removal of the omentum. Does code 58953 include partial or total omentectomy? If only for total omentectomy, should modifier 52 be applied when a partial omentectomy is performed? For code 58956 , if a complete/ total omentectomy is not performed, would modifier 52 be required to appropriately report the service? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This Find-A-Code article explains a coding inquiry related to CPT gynecologic surgery reporting, focusing on how omentectomy is reflected in two procedure codes and how reduced-services reporting is discussed in that context. It is intended for medical coders, billers, and compliance staff who work with operative reports, CPT surgery coding, and modifier application. The article centers on the code language, the relationship to clinical examples cited in CPT-related publications, and general guidance about whether modifier use is necessary when the procedure is not performed to the full extent described in the question.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate reporting of complex gynecologic surgery affects claim integrity, coding consistency, and documentation review. This topic is especially relevant when operative details appear to differ from code wording or example language.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames the coding question about omentectomy extent in two CPT gynecologic procedures.
- What general guidance is discussed regarding reduced-services reporting in this context.
- Why code wording and clinical examples can prompt clarification questions for coders.
- How the topic relates to operative documentation and CPT-based billing review.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Medical billers
- Coding auditors
- Compliance staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Gynecologic surgery coding specialists
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com